On this page, you will find:
- Information on the legal framework concerning LGBTQI+ rights in Iran
- Information on public attitude and state capacity to protect in Iran
- Relevant case law
- A list of organisations supporting LGBTQI+ individuals in Iran
- A list of Country of Origin experts in LGBTQI+ rights
- Country of Origin Information on the situation and treatment of the LGBTQI+ community in Iran
Legal Framework
Consensual sex between same-sex couples is unlawful in Iran. The Islamic Penal Code of Iran of 1991 defines Lavaat (sodomy) as consummated sexual activity between males, whether penetrative or not. Same-sex relations between women, or Mosaheghe, are defined as “homosexuality of women by genitals”. Both Lavaat and Mosaheghe are punishable by death; the Sharia judge decides on how to carry out the killing. In the case of sodomy (Art. 108–126) the death penalty applies if both the so-called ‘active’ and ‘passive’ persons are mature, of sound mind and have free will. The severity of the penalty will depend on factors such as marital status, religious affiliation, and prior convictions (Art. 234).
Non-penetrative acts, categorised as Tafkhiz (rubbing penis between thighs or buttocks) carries a punishment of 100 lashes, with the death penalty applied in cases of repeat offences or when religious differences exist between the parties (for example, where these acts take place between Muslims and non-Muslims (Art. 235 and 236)).
If consenting mature women, of sound mind, are found to have engaged in Mosaheghe (Art. 127–134), the punishment is 100 lashes for each party. If the act is repeated, 100 lashes are enforced each time and the death sentence will be issued the fourth time the persons are so charged. If Mosaheghe is proved by the confession of the doer and she repents accordingly, the Sharia judge may request the leader (ValieAmr) to pardon her.
Art. 1258, 1321 and 1324 of the Iranian Civil Code refer to the standards of proof required for an individual to be found guilty of charges against them. Art. 117, 120 and 128 of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran stipulate that lesbian acts and sodomy are “proved” by the Courts by the “testimony of four righteous men who might have observed it”. Human Rights Watch has argued that, in practice, these provisions are subject to varying interpretations and abuse.
Beyond these, less severe acts such as kissing or “touching with lust” between same-sex individuals can result in punishments of 31 to 74 lashes (Art. 237).
Enforcement of these laws is severe, with several executions having been reported in recent years, including for instance, two men executed in 2022 for sodomy committed years earlier.
The state also frequently raids private gatherings suspected of involving LGBTQI+ individuals, and conducts mass arrests. Once detained, individuals may face public humiliation and forced confessions. In such instances, forced anal examinations have also been reported, a practice widely condemned as torture by international human rights organisations.
The international community has repeatedly criticised Iran’s treatment of LGBTQI+ individuals. United Nations bodies and human rights organizations argue that Iran’s penal provisions violate its commitments under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Such actions also breach the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which guarantees protection from torture, inhuman treatment, and discrimination.
Iran provides a legal pathway for transgender individuals to change their gender, a practice which has been in place since 1987. However, this process is contingent upon mandatory diagnosis of gender dysphoria and the completion of gender-affirming surgeries. The government provides financial assistance, including interest-free loans, to cover the costs of these procedures.
Despite legal recognition following gender-affirming surgeries, transgender people face significant discrimination. They are frequently labelled as mentally ill. Violence and harassment of transgender individuals, as well as murders, are reported regularly.
Iran’s legal system, and its legal pathway for transgender individuals to change their gender, are based on a binary understanding of gender. Non-binary identities are not legally recognised, leaving no room for the recognition of non-binary or gender-fluid identities. LGBTQI+ individuals who are non-binary, or otherwise challenge traditional gender norms, often face harassment, violence, and arbitrary detention by state authorities, including the police.
There are no anti-discrimination protections in Iran for LGBTQI+ individuals. The legal system offers no recourse for those subjected to discrimination, hate crimes, or violence on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
There is no law in Iran addressing conversion therapy specifically. However, practices resembling conversion therapy are widely reported and often operate under the guise of “corrective treatments” for LGBTQI+ individuals, especially those identified as gay or lesbian. These unregulated treatments are provided lawfully by private and semi-governmental psychological and psychiatric clinics and are encouraged or endorsed by state and religious authorities.
The prevailing view among Iranian healthcare professionals is that homosexuality is an illness and ‘treatments’ for homosexual individuals can include psychoactive prescription medications (such as Valium), sex reassignment surgery as described above, and electric shock therapy on the hands and genitals of LGBTQI+ persons, hypnosis and coercive masturbation to pictures of the opposite sex. One such clinic, the Anonymous Sex Addicts Association of Iran, reportedly has branches in 18 provinces. In March 2016, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) expressed concern at reports that children identifying as LGBTQI+ had been subjected to electric shocks and the administration of hormones and psychoactive medications as forms of cure.
Iran’s enforcement of its laws against LGBTQI+ individuals is well documented. Between 2011 and 2023, multiple executions for consensual same-sex acts have been reported. In 2019, a 31-year-old man was publicly hanged for sodomy charges. In 2017, at least one prisoner was executed in Ardabil Central Prison on similar charges.
Mass arrests frequently follow raids on private gatherings. In 2017, a raid in central Iran led to the arrest of 30 men on charges of sodomy. Detainees in such cases often endure physical abuse, coerced confessions, and public flogging. Reports from organizations like 6Rang, an Iranian Lesbian and Transgender Network, indicate that LGBTQI+ individuals are frequently subjected to sexual violence, often at the hands of state authorities.
Some detainees are forced to undergo “corrective” treatments, such as electric shock therapy, as described above.
Many LGBTQI+ Iranians flee the country to escape persecution, trying to seek asylum in jurisdictions that may offer protection. Refugees often face significant challenges in proving their claims, as same-sex relationships and advocacy are criminalised in Iran under Art. 698 of the Islamic Penal Code, making it difficult to provide evidence of persecution. Those who are forcibly returned to Iran face severe risks, including arrest, torture, and even execution.
Legal precedents in Australia have recognized Iran as an exceptionally hostile environment for LGBTQI+ individuals.
Iran is a signatory to international treaties, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which prohibit torture, inhuman punishment, and discrimination. However, its domestic laws and practices starkly contravene these commitments. During its Universal Periodic Review, Iran has received numerous recommendations to decriminalise same-sex conduct and introduce anti-discrimination protections. These recommendations have been consistently rejected.
For more detailed information on the protection of LGBTQI+ rights in Iran, visit the Iran ILGA World Database.
Case Law
This section should provide an overview of the treatment of LGBTQI+ people, and specifically refugees, by the general public and state officials in the country.
The government censors LGBTQI+ content and aggressively targets advocacy efforts. Under the Computer Crimes Law (Original – Persian), the promotion of LGBTQI+ rights is criminalized as “spreading immorality”, with violators facing imprisonment or other severe penalties. Art. 6 of the Press Law states that the press is free, except for items which undermine Islam’s bases and commandments, and public and private rights, including the spread of “fornication and forbidden practices” and “publishing photographs, pictures, and material which violate public chastity”. A violation of this provision is subject to punishments as determined in Art. 698 of the Islamic Penal Code – this can involve imprisonment of between two months to two years and flogging of up to 74 lashes, or more severe punishments in cases of persistent offending.
Activists who advocate for LGBTQI+ rights also face severe punishment. In 2022, two prominent activists, Zahra Sedighi-Hamadani and Elham Choubdar, were sentenced to death on charges of Efsad-e Fel Arz (corruption on Earth) for their LGBTQI+ advocacy, although their sentences were later overturned due to significant international pressure.
In 2024, the United Nations Human Rights Council noted that the state of Iran perpetrates sexual and gender-based violence against, amongst others, LGBTQI+ persons arrested in connection with protests in Iran.
A 2021 study demonstrated that pervasive censorship of local and international websites has damaged the ability of Iran’s LGBTQI+ community to access and share crucial information.
State authorities are also alleged to harass and surveil LGBTQI+ individuals on the Internet. Senior Iran state officials have been reported to label LGBTQI+ people as “diseased” or “subhuman”. In 2023, then Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi asserted that homosexuality is akin to the “ugliest morality that is accepted by the modern world”. 6Rang, an NGO focusing on Iranian lesbian and transgender issues, have also reported that officials often use language that likens homosexuality to animalistic behaviour and deviancy, and that state-affiliated journalists have echoed the derogatory language of state officials.
In 2021, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran has noted that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons are encouraged to seek reparative therapies or sex reassignment surgeries to cure their gender non-conformity or same-sex attraction (which represent a gender identity disorder). Sex changes have been legal in Iran for nearly 30 years, with the government providing up to half the cost of the operation for those with limited financial resources. This is seen as helping trans-gender persons to align themselves with the natural societal order. However, transgender individuals in Iran who do not wish to transition (or are unable to afford the procedures) are deprived of legal identity recognition and face severe barriers to maintaining education and employment, amongst others.
The number of gay Iranian men executed for homosexuality appears to have risen sharply in recent years. The British Foreign and Commonwealth Office has expressed concern that LGBTQI+ individuals are frequently charged with other crimes such as rape, fraud, or robbery in order to justify their execution.
M.I. v. Switzerland, Application No. 56390/21, European Court of Human Rights, 2024
The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Switzerland violated Article 3 of the European Convention, which prohibits inhuman or degrading treatment, by rejecting an Iranian asylum seeker’s application on the grounds that he could live discreetly in Iran.
Supreme Administrative Court, 13 January 2012, KHO:2012:1, Finland.
Asylum applicant fled Iran following his sentencing for homosexuality and ultimately gained status in Finland.
HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
The Supreme Court of the UK eliminated the so-called ‘discretion’ for applicants claiming asylum from persecution on the basis of sexuality. For a return of someone who has a well-founded fear of persecution on the basis of sexuality, the new test essentially requires a finding that the applicant would choose to live discreetly as a matter of personal preference, rather than as a function of fear for social or formal punishment or violence.
XY (Iran) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2008] EWCA Civ 911, United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales), 31 July 2008
This UK case, prior to the elimination of the discretion test in HJ and HT, concerns the rejection of an asylum application based on the expectation of discretion in sexual relationships.
HS (Homosexuals: Minors, Risk on Return) Iran v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2005] UKAIT 00120, United Kingdom
Successful appeal of removal decision for Iranian gay man in the UK during ‘discretion test’ era.
LGBTQI+ Organisations
Email: info@rainbowrailroad.org
Rainbow Railroad is an international non-profit organization dedicated to helping LGBTI+ individuals who face persecution and violence due to their sexual orientation or gender identity. The organization aims to provide safe pathways for those at risk to escape their countries to safer places, offering legal and advisory support to help them secure international protection.
Additionally, Rainbow Railroad provides emergency assistance, including financial aid and temporary housing for individuals facing immediate threats. The organization also focuses on advocacy and awareness through research-based campaigns, aiming to influence international policies and improve the global conditions of the LGBTI+ community.
The organization also offers digital and in-person resources, including legal guidance, mental health support, and emergency services, to ensure the safety and well-being of individuals seeking refuge.
Country of Origin Experts in LGBTQI+ rights
Email: scottlong1980@gmail.com
Dr. Scott Long, Ph.D., Harvard, has led a long career in LGBTI rights activism focusing on Eastern Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East and North Africa. He has taught in Hungary, Romania and the Human Rights Program of Harvard Law School. Dr Scott Long was programme director of the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) from 1996 to 2002 and led the organisation’s advocacy at the 2001 UN General Assembly’s Special Session on HIV/AIDS. He founded and directed the Human Rights Watch’s LGBT Rights Program until 2010 and has produced reports on the situation of LGBTI persons in Egypt, Iraq, and Iran, discrimination against binational same-sex couples in the United States, as well as working with LGBTI activists in Russia.
COI on LGBTQI+ situation
The following sections contain documents that can be consulted when looking for Country of Origin Information (COI) with regards to the situation and treatment of the LGBTQI+ community in Iran.
This report presents COI on Kenya focusing on issues identified to be of relevance in refugee status determination for Kenyan nationals of the LGBTQI+ community. Research concentrated on events that took place between 1 January 2020 and 15 December 2023.
Iran Legal Assistance
Find organisations providing legal assistance to refugees in Iran.
Iran COI
Find Iran's Country of Origin information (COI) experts, reports, commentaries, and relevant documents.
We are always looking to expand the resources on our platform. If you know about relevant resources, or you are aware of organisations and/or individuals to include in our directories, please get in touch.
Last updated January 2024