On this page, you will find:
- Information on the legal framework concerning LGBTQI+ rights in Antigua and Barbuda
- Relevant case law
- Information on public attitude and state capacity to protect in Antigua and Barbuda
- A list of organisations supporting LGBTQI+ individuals in Antigua and Barbuda
- A list of Country of Origin experts in LGBTQI+ rights
Legal Framework
International Human Rights Treaties to Which Antigua and Barbuda is a Party
Antigua and Barbuda is a party to multiple international human rights treaties, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).
The ICCPR is a United Nations treaty implemented to protect the civil and political rights of the civilians in Member States. The ICCPR contains several Articles of relevance to the protection of LGBTQI+ rights in Antigua and Barbuda, including Article 2, which provides that States must respect and ensure the rights of all individuals within their jurisdiction without distinction (including with regard to sex), Article 7, which states that individuals are protected from torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, including non-consensual medical and scientific experimentation, and Article 26, which provides that all persons entitled to equal protection under the law without discrimination (including on the basis of sex). Critically, the prohibition against discrimination on grounds of “sex” under Article 26 of the ICCPR has been interpreted by the UN Human Rights Committee in the landmark case of Toonen v Australia (1994) (as well as subsequently by a number of national courts) to include a prohibition against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
The ICESCR is a United Nations treaty implemented to protect the economic and social rights of the civilians in Member States. These include ensuring that Member States guarantee the rights within the treaty ‘without discrimination based on race, sex, gender or other status.’ The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) confirmed in its 2009 General Comment No. 20 on non-discrimination that this non-discrimination provision should be interpreted to include sexual orientation and gender identity. The CESCR also confirmed that member states should “ensure that a person’s sexual orientation is not a barrier to realizing Covenant rights, for example, in accessing survivor’s pension rights” and clarified that “gender identity is recognized as among the prohibited grounds of discrimination“.
Antigua and Barbuda’s Compliance with International Human Rights Instruments
Despite Antigua and Barbuda being a signatory to the ICCPR and ICESCR, development of LGBTQI+ rights in the country appears to fall short of its international human rights obligations.
In 2021, prior to the ruling in Orden David et al v The Attorney General of Antigua & Barbuda (David), the United Nations Human Rights Council delivered a Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Antigua and Barbuda, in which several recommendations were submitted with the view of improving the state of human rights in the country. Several recommendations related to LGBTQI+ rights, including (but not limited to):
- Prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity;
- Introducing legislation to prohibit the discrimination of individuals on the basis of sexual identity or sexual orientation;
- Repealing and reform of the Sexual Offences Act of 1995; and
- Decriminalising consensual adult same-sex relationships.
However, these recommendations were only ‘noted’ as opposed to ‘accepted’ by the country in March 2022 when reporting on its adoption of the UPR recommendations. Antigua and Barbuda’s next UPR is tentatively scheduled to take place in late autumn 2026.
Further, a 2025 report from The Advocates for Human Rights which was published after the ruling in David, stated that Antigua and Barbuda had ‘failed to uphold its obligations under the ICCPR with respect to members of the LGBTQ+ community’. The report mentions that Antigua and Barbuda has been inadequate in protecting the LGBTQI+ community from violence by State and by non-State actors as directed under Article 7 of the ICCPR, which encompasses the right not to face cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. For example, individuals have noted that when reporting crimes that are motivated or aggravated by their sexual orientation and / or gender identity, the police are ‘slow to respond’ and fail to take the matter seriously. Whilst the report notes that this may be due to a lack of comprehensive sensitivity training, it prevents individuals from reporting crimes and hence further perpetuates violence towards the community.
The 2025 report also states that members of the LGBTQI+ community in Antigua and Barbuda continue to face significant discrimination by State and non-State actors due to their sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression, in direct violation of Article 27 of the ICCPR. Whilst it was noted that sections 12 and 15 of the Sexual Offences Act had been repealed, the report concluded that individuals still face discrimination as other legislation has not been reformed to properly protect against discrimination in other areas of life, such as housing.
Same-sex sexual activity
Antigua and Barbuda’s Constitution (Constitution) is the supreme law of Antigua and Barbuda as per Article 2 of the same. The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (ECSC) is the superior court for Member States in the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), including Antigua and Barbuda, with a primary role of providing and administering justice and interpreting the Constitution.
Prior to July 2022, same-sex intimacy was criminalised in Antigua and Barbuda under sections 12 and 15 of the Sexual Offences Act 1995 (the Act). Section 12 of the Act criminalised, among other things, the offence of buggery – anal sexual intercourse – between two consenting persons over the age of sixteen and stipulated that “a person who commits buggery is guilty of an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment … for fifteen years, if committed by an adult on another adult.” Section 15 of the Act criminalised, among other things, ‘serious indecency’ between two consenting persons over the age of sixteen and stipulated that “a person who commits an act of serious indecency on or towards another is guilty of an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment“. Section 15 of the Act defined ‘serious indecency’ as “an act, other than sexual intercourse (whether natural or unnatural), by a person involving the use of the genital organ for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire.” Acts committed in private between husband and wife or between a male person and a female person over the age of sixteen, were expressly excluded from the scope of the section 15 offence.
Since 5 July 2022, same-sex sexual activity has been legal in Antigua and Barbuda, following the decision of the ECSC in the case of Orden David et al v Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda (2022) (David), which declared the criminalisation of same-sex sexual activity in Antigua and Barbuda as being unconstitutional. The ECSC found the relevant provisions of sections 12 and 15 of the Act to violate the rights to liberty, protection of the law, freedom of expression, protection of personal privacy and protection from discrimination based on sex – as enshrined in sections 3, 12 and 14 of the Constitution. The Court therefore held that sections 12 and 15 of the Act were void to the extent that they criminalised consensual acts in private between persons aged sixteen or older.
Same-sex marriage
Same-sex unions or marriages are not legally recognised in Antigua and Barbuda. Marriages in Antigua and Barbuda are governed by the Marriage Act 1925 (the Marriage Act). Although the Marriage Act does not explicitly define marriage as the union between a man and a woman, to the exclusion of other possible unions, the structure and language of the Marriage Act appear to indicate that only male-female unions are permitted. For example, Form B in the First Schedule of the Marriage Act (the marriage licence) refers to the parties as “Bachelor” and “Spinster”, or “Widower” and “Widow”. Similarly, section 3(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1948 stipulates that a “petition for divorce may be presented to the Court either by the husband or the wife”.
As of early 2026, there have been no court cases brought to test whether the Marriage Act could apply to unions other than those between a man and a woman. Further, the Government has explicitly opposed the legalisation of same-sex marriage as recently as 2019. For example, it was reported in the Antigua Observer that Attorney General Steadroy Benjamin expressed that, despite receiving requests to consider legalising same-sex marriage from various groups, Antigua and Barbuda was ‘not going down that road‘.
Right to change legal gender
Individuals in Antigua and Barbuda are unable to change their legal gender. Whilst individuals can legally change their name on legal identification, they are unable to change their gender marker on birth certificates or other forms of identification. Unlike the procedure to change one’s legal name, there is no mention of an application to change one’s gender in the Civil Registration (Vital Statistics) Act 2020 (Civil Registration Act) or in any other legislation.
Notably, pursuant to section 25(1) of the Civil Registration Act, an application to change one’s name may involve a hearing before the Registrar. The Registrar may also without hearing the application themselves refer it to a Judge. As of early 2026, there have been no reports of any cases in Antigua and Barbuda where an applicant applied to change their name to reflect their gender identity.
Ultimately, the Registrar (or Judge where applicable) is granted broad powers to refuse an application to register a change of name. Specifically, section 26(2) of the Civil Registration Act sets out that the “Registrar may refuse to register a change of name if the name to be registered is offensive or against public order or is sought for an improper purpose”.
LGBTQI+ discrimination
There are no explicit anti-discrimination laws or policies in place to protect members of the LGBTQI+ community with regards to matters like employment or housing.
Hate crime protections
Antigua and Barbuda does not have specific hate crime laws. However, targeting a victim because of their sexual orientation or their gender identity is considered an aggravating factor under the ECSC Sentencing Guidelines. These Guidelines are published by the ECSC and are binding on the courts of Antigua and Barbuda.
Pursuant to Rules 7(1) and 8(1) of Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (Sentencing Guidelines) Rules, 2019, the Sentencing Guidelines are to be followed when sentencing defendants in cases involving homicide offences. Similar provisions apply in the case of other violence offences. The relevant guidelines must be applied unless doing so would not be in the interests of justice. If the court chooses not to apply the guidelines, it must provide explicit reasons when passing sentences.
In the Sentencing Guidelines for Homicide Offences, under section 1 ‘Sentencing for the Offence of Murder’, paragraph 5(l) stipulates that the seriousness of the offence could be considered exceptionally high in cases where the murder is “motivated by hatred for or prejudice against a group of people to which the offender believed the victim belonged (e.g. people of a particular religion, race, or ethnic origin, language, or sexual orientation or age or having a particular disability)”.
Under section 3 ‘Sentencing for the Offence of Manslaughter by Reason of an Unlawful Act’, aggravating factors of the offence include the offender being motivated “by or demonstrating hostility based on any of the following characteristics or presumed characteristics of the victim: religion, race, disability, sexual orientation or transgender identity”.
A search of the ECSC’s database using keywords such as “gender,” “gender identity” and “sexual orientation” reveals little evidence that these aggravating factors or circumstances have been consistently applied by the courts in Antigua and Barbuda when sentencing defendants. For a discussion of the only case tried by the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court which references these factors, see below in the Case Law section.
Same-sex adoption
Same-sex adoption is prohibited in Antigua and Barbuda. The Children (Care and Adoption) Act 2015 (Care and Adoption Act) defines a “couple” as a “man and a woman” who are either married to each other or in a cohabiting relationship of some permanence.
However, LGBTQI+ singles can still adopt – section 93 of the Care and Adoption Act states that a single person may apply for an adoption order, subject to being a resident of Antigua and Barbuda for at least six months and being at least 18 years older than the child. To date, there are no available reports of prospective adoptive parents being denied their adoption request because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Blood donations
LGBTQI+ people are not explicitly prohibited from donating blood. In particular, a news article dated 28 January 2025 entitled ‘Senators Joseph and Newton Urge Public to Become Blood Donors‘, sets out some of the eligibility criteria for being a donor. Sexual orientation or gender identity do not appear in the list. If you wish to donate blood, you should check the most recent guidance from the Ministry of Health.
For more detailed information on the protection of LGBTQI+ rights in Antigua and Barbuda, visit the Antigua and Barbuda ILGA World Database.
Homosexuality/ Bisexuality
As noted above, same-sex marriage is not permitted in Antigua and Barbuda, and survey data from 2016-2017 suggested that 88.1% of respondents did not approve of same sex marriages.
A report published in 2022, approximately six months before the ruling in David, by the project DECIDES Antigua and Barbuda for LGBTI and Child Rights, a collaboration between NGOs, the University of the West Indies Open Campus and the European Union, highlighted the discrimination faced by LGBTQI+ persons in Antigua and Barbuda. The DECIDES report noted that LGBTQI+ people in Antigua and Barbuda are “subjected to mockery or taunts, threats of violence, and actual violence.” The DECIDES report also highlighted how homophobic lyrics in popular songs, particularly in several dancehall and reggae songs, contributed to hostile public attitudes towards LGBTQI+ persons.
A U.S. State Department report for the year 2023 presented a more hopeful picture, suggesting that the situation of LGBTQI+ persons in Antigua and Barbuda might be improving following the judgment in David. It noted that there were no reports of violence or harassment in 2023 against LGBTQI+ individuals, no reports of conversion therapy and that representatives of NGOs reported that hostile behaviour towards LGBTQI+ persons had decreased following the ruling in David. However, the report identified continuing challenges facing the LGBTQI+ community in Antigua and Barbuda, including that LGBTQI+ persons had reportedly had difficulty finding employment. Moreover, the report noted that “[t]he law did not explicitly recognize LGBTQI+ couples and their families or grant them rights equal to other persons.”
Antigua and Barbuda is a majority Christian country, and conservative religious attitudes continue to play a role in anti- LGBTQI+ stigma, including following the ruling in David. Bishop Charlesworth Brown, who is president of the Antigua and Barbuda Council of Church Leaders, was reported in 2023 to have said in reference to same-sex relationships that “I don’t think that God created man and woman to engage in that way” and “It’s for the sake of our children, the health of the nations, the preservation of our people”. Pastor David Murphy, a pastor at Grace Baptist Church in St. John’s, Antigua, said in 2017 “…there is definitely a concerted effort to normalise homosexuality. There is no question about that and I think that the political groups, whatever party, I think they are a part of global conspiracy to push this on the people and I think it’s a horrendous act, that we will pay for it dearly in the future”.
In January 2025 Orden David, the prominent LGBTQI+ campaigner who was a claimant in the 2022 Supreme Court ruling decriminalising same-sex activity, went missing. Concerns have been raised by his loved ones that his involvement in the case and sexual orientation made him a target.
Transgender and Intersex Persons
Public attitudes towards transgender people in Antigua and Barbuda can be hostile. In 2018, a transgender woman was killed by her partner. The case highlighted gender-based violence in LGBTQI+ relationships and the need for police training when engaging with persons of diverse gender identities. In reporting the case, the police force misgendered the victim by stating “a man was stabbed to death”. Former Senator Aziza Lake, a member of the Labour Party, advised in 2020 that transgender women are particularly vulnerable to violence as their identity “challenges people’s ideas of masculinity”.
As noted in the 2022 DECIDES report, local media have also demonstrated a lack of understanding of the victim’s gender identity when the Antigua Observer reported “Joseph is a transgender woman who was born male, but, lived his life dressing and appearing to be a woman”.
Despite the fact that the ruling in David provided that it is unconstitutional to discriminate against a person due to their gender identity, there have been no further steps to pass laws in Antigua and Barbuda protecting persons from discrimination based on gender identity.
De-criminalisation of same-sex sexual activity
As referred to above, in 2022, the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court declared parts of the statutory offences of buggery and serious indecency as unconstitutional in Orden David et al v The Attorney General of Antigua & Barbuda. Discussion of the rationale and the consequences of this case are included in the Domestic Legal Framework section above.
Sentencing in the case of violence involving LGBTQI+ individuals
In the 2019 case of Regina v Anthony Joseph, the ECSC High Court Judge discussed sentencing guidelines for manslaughter where violence was initiated by the victim owing to the perceived sexuality of the defendant. The fact that the victim persecuted the defendant for years because of their perceived sexuality was referenced as a mitigating factor at sentencing. More specifically, the Hon. Mr. Justice Iain Morley QC explained:
“Let this be clear: attack on the grounds of perceived sexual orientation is completely unacceptable. A strong message must be sent to the public. Edwards’ [the victim] persecution of Joseph [the defendant] as background to how this offence occurred means the sentence will be reduced a further 2 years, to 8 years.”
Reports of arrests
The 2023 Human Rights Report on Antigua and Barbuda (US State Department, 2023) stated that ‘there were no reports of violence or harassment committed by police, other government agents, or non-State actors against LGBTQIA+ persons’, citing that societal attitude towards the community had improved following the 2022 judgment in David.
In the 2022 case of Washington Manuel Bramble v Attorney General (2022), the claimant brought a claim against the Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda, alleging unlawful imprisonment and discrimination based on her gender identity. She argued that her conviction and subsequent seven-day imprisonment for malicious damage to property were tainted by prejudice from the Chief Magistrate, whom she accused of bias due to her gender identity. She sought damages and other relief, asserting that she had not received a fair trial. Although the pre-trial memorandum included references to issues such as the claimant’s treatment while in custody (the claimant alleged that her hair was forcefully cut by prison officers and that she was prevented from identifying as a woman while imprisoned), the Court ultimately did not consider arguments relating to gender identity discrimination, holding that only the claim concerning unlawful imprisonment was properly pleaded. On that issue, the Court found that the Chief Magistrate had a valid reason for keeping the claimant in custody while determining the appropriate sentence, as the claimant had already been found guilty of the charge.
Examples of Antigua and Barbuda-related asylum cases in other countries
In 2024, the United Nation’s High Commissioner for Refugees’ Data Finder recorded 91 refugees under the High Commissioner’s mandate worldwide emanating from Antigua and Barbuda. This figure includes 80 asylum-seekers.
Save for a post on X by Rainbow Migration stating that a gay man from Antigua and Barbuda was granted asylum in the UK in 2014, there do not appear to be any specific records of LGBTQI+ people from Antigua and Barbuda applying for asylum abroad.
Organisations supporting LGBTQI+ individuals
Email: info@ecequality.org
Website / WordPress / LinkedIn / Facebook / Instagram
ECADE is an umbrella group of human rights organisations advocating for LGBTQI+ rights in nine countries in the Eastern Caribbean, including Antigua and Barbuda. It works to strengthen regional capacity for the defence of human rights with a vision of fostering “[a]n empowered eastern Caribbean that promotes a culture of human rights, equality, justice and respect for all LGBTQ+ people.” ECADE has spearheaded an initiative of launching strategic litigation in five countries in the Eastern Caribbean to challenge laws discriminating against LGBTQI+ people. The Orden David et al v The Attorney General of Antigua & Barbuda case was part of this initiative. ECADE’s member organisations in Antigua and Barbuda include Meeting Emotional and Social Needs Holistically (MESH), Women Against Rape (WAR) and Intersect Antigua.
Email: intersect.anu@gmail.com
Website / LinkedIn / Facebook / Instagram / X (Twitter)
Intersect Antigua is an organisation with a mission of “connecting Queeribbean and Caribbean Feminists through storytelling, art and advocacy.” It was formed in 2015 with a mission of ending violence against women and “Queeribbean” people. Intersect Antigua states that it is “committed to centering the experiences and needs of the most marginalized among us, including queer, trans, and non-binary people and those with disabilities who are Black, Indigenous, and identify as people of colour. We are here to re-imagine a world where Caribbean women, men, and non-binary people are free to live and love in societies where they are cared for and cherished.”
Email: womenagainstrapeab@gmail.com
Website (Caribbean Policy Development Centre) / Facebook / Instagram / X (Twitter)
WAR is an organisation dedicated to advocating for prevention of gender-based violence, promoting gender equality in healthcare and advocating for justice for victims of gender-based violence. WAR was a co-litigant in the David case. WAR also contributed to the 2022 DECIDES report regarding discrimination against LGBTQI+ persons in Antigua and Barbuda. WAR’s president, Alexandrina Wong, is a member of ECADE’s 2023-2025 Board of Directors and was one of the authors of the 2022 DECIDES report.
Website (The Silver Lining Foundation) / LinkedIn / Facebook
MESH is an organisation dedicated to providing psychosocial and other services to the LGBTQI+ community in Antigua and Barbuda. MESH’s former president, Orden David, brought the David case in collaboration with WAR and ECADE.
Country of Origin experts in LGBTQI+ rights
We do not currently list any specialists on LGBTQI+ issues in Antigua and Barbuda, but we welcome suggestions. If you have any suggestions, please get in touch.
Antigua and Barbuda Legal Assistance
Find organisations providing legal assistance to refugees in Antigua and Barbuda.
Antigua and Barbuda COI
Find Antigua and Barbuda Country of Origin information (COI) experts, reports, commentaries, and relevant documents.
We are always looking to expand the resources on our platform. If you know about relevant resources, or you are aware of organisations and/or individuals to include in our directories, please get in touch.
Last updated June 2026